Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The Microsoft Word file submitted does not contain the authors' names; The contribution is original and unpublished, and is not under consideration for publication by any other journal; The text follows the style standards and bibliographic requirements; The work addresses consultancy/application of cases for teaching, or is a teaching case.

Author Guidelines

The evaluation process is double-blind. It is important to remember:

1. Text Structure: Title (in Portuguese and English); Abstract and Keywords (in Portuguese and English)—the abstract must include the objective, methodology, results, and conclusion of the study; Body of the text (must include the methodology used in the study); References in ABNT format.

2. Layout: Word format (.doc); 1.5 cm line spacing; Times New Roman font, size 12; A4 paper size; all margins (top, bottom, left, and right) must be 2.5 cm. Indents must be set using the text editor’s ruler (not the TAB key). Scientific articles must exceed 5 pages.

3. Figures: The use of images, tables, and illustrations should follow common sense and, preferably, the ethics and axiology of the scientific community discussing the manuscript's themes.

4. Authorship: All authors must be included in the metadata at the time of submission.

5. ABNT Reference Examples:

Journal Article:
GOHN, Maria da Glória. Abordagens Teóricas no Estudo dos Movimentos Sociais na América Latina. Caderno CRH, v. 21, n. 54, p. 439-455, Sep./Dec. 2008.

Book:
GANGA, Gilberto Miller Devós. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (TCC) na engenharia de produção. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012.

Webpage:
AMOROSO, Danilo. O que é Web 2.0? Available at: http://www.tecmundo.com.br/web/183-o-que-e-web-2-0-. Accessed on: Mar 12, 2016.

The evaluation of manuscripts is conducted through a double-blind peer-review process, where each manuscript is evaluated by at least three external reviewers selected by expertise or affinity regarding the thematic content of the manuscript under review. The evaluation is preferably conducted in one round:

1) After submission, the section editor (or support staff) verifies if all data is present in the file and the journal's system, and if the submission is suitable for the respective section (the editor may send the work for evaluation, move it to another section, or reject the work and advise on a new submission).

2) The first round of evaluation begins and is only concluded when reviewers and authors reach a consensus on the changes made to the work (if no agreement is reached, the editor decides whether to change the reviewers, reject the work, or request a resubmission).

3) If necessary, a second round of evaluation begins and is only concluded when the reviewers (different from those in the first round) and authors reach a consensus on the changes made to the work (if no agreement is reached, the editor decides whether to change the reviewers, reject the article, or request a resubmission).

4) After the editor’s analysis, the author submits the final version of the manuscript, along with the respective similarity detection software report (likely CopySpider) and a memo detailing the changes made to the work throughout the peer-review process.

Copyright Notice

By submitting a manuscript to the Revista de Casos e Consultoria, authors agree to the following terms:

1. Ownership and Licensing

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). This license allows the work to be shared with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that full citation of the original source is included.

2. Responsibility and Originality

  • Authors declare that the manuscript is original, authored by them, and has not been previously published nor is under consideration by another journal.
  • Authors guarantee that the work does not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties and that all data and cited sources are accurate and reliable.

3. Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

In accordance with international ethical standards (COPE and scientific integrity guidelines), RCC establishes:

  • Human Authorship: Artificial Intelligence systems or models (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, among others) cannot be listed as authors or co-authors. Authorship implies legal and ethical responsibility for the content, as well as the capacity for critical judgment—prerogatives exclusive to human beings.
  • Disclosure of Use: If any generative AI tool has been used at any stage of manuscript preparation (including data collection, analysis, translation, or writing support), authors must properly disclose its use in the Methods section or in a footnote.
  • Transparency: The description must specify which tool was used and how it contributed to the work. The use of AI to generate text without proper review and critical validation by the authors will be considered academic misconduct.
  • Final Responsibility: Human authors are fully responsible for all content of the manuscript, including technical accuracy, data integrity, and the absence of plagiarism or AI-generated hallucinations.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.