Perspectivas de Estudio sobre la Toma de Decisiones Estratégicas en Organizaciones Públicas:
Discusión Teórica y Revisión de Literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2675-8512.2025v8n1ID37457Palabras clave:
Toma de decisiones estratégicas. Organizaciones públicas. Racionalidad.Resumen
Este artículo tuvo como objetivo realizar un levantamiento de los temas y problemas de investigación más recientes sobre el comportamiento decisional en organizaciones públicas, identificando los principales factores que influyen en las decisiones estratégicas y sus interacciones. A partir de una revisión de la literatura, el estudio analiza publicaciones de los últimos cinco años en la base de datos Web of Science, enfocándose en las dinámicas políticas y administrativas del proceso decisional. Los resultados señalan una tendencia creciente hacia investigaciones empíricas y conceptuales, destacando la relevancia de factores como el contexto político, la cultura organizacional y la interacción entre los actores en la formulación de políticas públicas. En términos metodológicos, predomina el uso de la investigación cuantitativa y encuestas en estudios sobre el tema. Esta investigación revela la importancia de considerar tanto las dimensiones racionales como las emocionales y políticas en la toma de decisiones. Las contribuciones del estudio incluyen un análisis profundo de los procesos decisionales, ofreciendo insights prácticos para gestores y formuladores de políticas, y enriqueciendo el debate teórico en la administración pública. El trabajo pretende promover una gestión más eficiente y alineada con las demandas sociales, al mismo tiempo que fortalece la base teórica para futuras investigaciones.
Descargas
Citas
AKINCI, C.; SADLER-SMITH, E. Collective intuition: Implications for improved decision making and organizational learning. British Journal of Management, v. 30, n. 3, p. 558-577, 2019.
ALLISON, G. T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.
ANDRADE, D. Efeito do arrependimento na tomada de decisão em contexto de julgamento moral. 2019. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia Social e das Organizações) – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2019.
ANDREWS, R.; BREWER, G. A. Can rational planning foster cooperative behavior? How perceived self-efficacy mediates the relationship between strategic plan use, performance information use, and the strategic voice of local advisors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1–18, 2019.
ARAÚJO, R. C.; SIENA, O.; DA SILVA, R. M. P.; CARVALHO, E. M. Tomada de decisão na administração pública: uma revisão sistemática. REA - Revista Eletrônica de Administração, v. 18, n. 1, p. 32-49, 2020.
BALOGUN, J.; JOHNSON, G. From Intended Strategies to Unintended Outcomes: The Impact of Change Recipient Sensemaking. Organization Studies, v. 26, n. 11, p. 1501-1527, 2005.
BARILE, S.; LUSCH, R. F.; REYNOSO, J.; SAVIANO, M.; SPOHRER, J. C. Systems, networks, and ecosystems in service research. Journal of Service Management, 2016.
BASIOLI, R. O. Tomada de decisão nas organizações: teorias, processos e influências. 2018. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2018.
BAZERMAN, M. H.; MOORE, D. A. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. 7. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
BARZELAY, M.; CAMPBELL, C. Preparing for the future: Strategic planning in the U.S. Air Force. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2003.
BRUGNACH, M.; INGRAM, H. Ambiguity: The challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 15, n. 1, p. 60–71, 2012.
BEACH, D. Process Tracing in Crisis Decision Making. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2021.
BOLTON, M. What influences public decision‐makers? An Australian case study. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2023.
BOYNE, G. A.; MEIER, K. J. Changing administrative intensity and staff composition: Downsizing management in education. Public Administration, v. 91, n. 2, p. 355–377, 2013.
BRUNSSON, N. The irrationality of action and action rationality: decisions, ideologies and organizational actions. Journal of Management Studies, v. 19, n. 1, p. 29-44, 1982.
CAILLIER, J. G. Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking-charge behavior in police services. Public Administration Quarterly, v. 40, n. 2, p. 226–255, 2016.
CERQUEIRA, F. Comportamento e Decisão Organizacional: Teorias e Aplicações. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2020.
DAFT, R. L.; WEICK, K. E. Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, v. 9, n. 2, p. 284-295, 1984.
DHANESH, G. S.; SRIRAMESH, K. Strategies for social change in nonprofit contexts: A typology of communication approaches in public communication campaigns. Journal of Communication Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 233–251, 2018.
EDWARDS, W. S. Behavioral Decision Theory. In: EDWARDS, W. S. (Ed.). Decision Theory: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Wiley, 1961. p.1-45.
EDWARDS, W. S. The Theory of Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin, v. 51, n. 4, p. 380-417, 1954.
ELIAS, R.; DAVIS, J. Motivational Dynamics in the Public Sector: An Experimental Study on Altruistic, Cooperative, and Justice Behaviors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 28, n. 2, p. 341-357, 2018.
ESTEVE, M.; URBIG, D.; VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, A.; BOYNE, G. Prosocial behavior and public service motivation. Public Administration Review, v. 76, n. 1, p. 177–187, 2016.
FLIGSTEIN, N.; MCADAM, D. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1–26, 2011.
FARACO, M. M.; LAVARDA, R. A. B.; GELBCKE, F. L. Tomada de decisão em hospitais de ensino: entre formalismo e síntese intuitiva. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 53, n. 4, p. 769-779, 2019.
FERIGATO, E. Modelos de tomada de decisão do consumidor, destacando os aspectos aplicáveis aos serviços financeiros e os que requerem adaptação. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, v. 2, n. 1, p. 322-347, 2021.
FORRET, M. L.; DOUGHERTY, T. W. Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 25, n. 3, p. 419–437, 2004.
GEORGE, B.; DESMIDT, S. What motivates politicians to use strategic plans as decision-making tools? Insights from the theory of planned behavior. Public Administration, v. 96, n. 3, p. 578–593, 2018.
GIGERENZER, G.; GAISSMAIER, W. Decision making: Nonrational theories. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, 2015. p. 911-916.
GILOVICH, T.; GRIFFIN, D.; KAHNEMAN, D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
GOMES, L. A. M.; GOMES, C. F. S.; ALMEIDA, A. T. de. Tomada de decisão gerencial: enfoque multicritério. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
GONÇALVES, R. C.; LOUW, T. L.; MARKKULA, G.; MERAT, N. Aplicabilidade de modelos de tomada de decisão de risco para entender o comportamento de motoristas durante retomadas de controle em automação veicular. Ergodesign & HCI, v. 7, p. 36-50, 2019.
GRON, A. L.; SALOMONSEN, H. A. Political and Administrative Alignment in Times of Instability: Managing Media-Induced Crises. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 29, n. 3, p. 516-529, 2019.
HANSEN, M. B.; EJERSBO, N. Political instability and local government capacity to respond to reputational threats in unison. Local Government Studies, v. 46, n. 5, p. 731–751, 2020.
HICKSON, D. J.; WILSON, D. C. Theories of Decision Making: An Overview. In: WILSON, D. C.; HICKSON, D. J. (Eds.). Decision Making in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. p. 15-32.
HODGKINSON, G. P.; SADLER-SMITH, E. The dynamics of intuition and analysis in managerial and organizational decision making. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 32, n. 4, p. 473-492, 2018.
HOFFMAN, D. M.; KLEIN, G. The Role of Interpretation in Decision Making. Journal of Decision Making, v. 11, n. 3, p. 201-220, 2017.
HOMBERG, F. et al. Behavioral Factors Influencing Improvements in Public Sector Environments: The Role of Motivation and Leadership. Public Administration Review, v. 79, n. 4, p. 596-607, 2019.
KAHNEMAN, D.; SLOVIC, P.; TVERSKY, A. (Eds.). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
KAHNEMAN, D.; TVERSKY, A. The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, v. 246, n. 1, p. 160-173, 1982.
KEARNEY, R. C.; MEYERS, R. S. Strategic management in public organizations: Profiling the public entrepreneur as a strategist. Public Personnel Management, v. 47, n. 1, p. 3–24, 2018.
KELLER, S.; SADLER-SMITH, E. The Role of Intuition in Decision Making: Theoretical and Practical Insights. Journal of Business Research, v. 98, p. 292-305, 2019.
KIM, S. Do public servants game performance budgeting systems? Evidence from the program evaluation assessment tool in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 85, n. 2, p. 311–328, 2019.
KIM, S. E.; LEE, J. What drives commitment to social responsibility? An empirical analysis of public enterprises in South Korea. Public Management Review, v. 21, n. 10, p. 1500–1523, 2019.
LARTEY, P. Y.; KONG, Y.; AFRIYIE, S. O.; SANTOSH, R. J.; BAH, F. B. M. Knowledge management issues in India: A public sector perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 44, n. 3, p. 215–230, 2019.
LEAL, S. M. N.; LIMA, A. C.; MAIA, A. B. G. R. Ferramentas da administração estratégica e tomada de decisão em empresas estatais. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 58, p. e2023-0033, 2024.
LEE, Y.; LEE, G. The cost and benefit of interdepartmental collaboration: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 43, n. 5, p. 1086–1110, 2020.
LINDBLOM, C. E. Still Muddling Through: The Role of Policymaking in the Policy Process. Public Administration Review, v. 41, n. 6, p. 516-526, 1981.
LIU, Y.; LI, J. Does vertical administrative integration of environmental monitoring at the provincial level effectively motivate firms to improve environmental behavior in China? International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 86, n. 3, p. 571–588, 2019.
LOTTA, G. S. A Análise do Processo Decisório de Burocratas do Nível de Rua: Um Modelo Analítico com Sete Elementos. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 53, n. 1, p. 134-155, 2019.
LUAN, S.; REB, J.; GIGERENZER, G. Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, v. 62, n. 6, p. 1735-1759, 2019.
MAMAVI, G.; GREGOIRE, P.; MARTINEZ, J. Methodological Robustness in Strategic Alliances: Visualizing and Measuring the Impact of Partnerships on Public Contracts. Journal of Public Procurement, v. 17, n. 3, p. 247-264, 2017.
MARCH, J. G. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press, 1994.
MARCH, J. G.; SIMON, H. A. Organizations. 2. ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958.
MEDEIROS, I. F. de. Teorias de Decisão. Brasília: UnB, 1997.
MINTZBERG, H.; AHLSTRAND, B.; LAMPEL, J. Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. 2. ed. New York: The Free Press, 2005.
PASHA, O.; POISTER, T. H. The impact of performance management under environmental turbulence. The American Review of Public Administration, v. 49, n. 4, p. 441-453, 2019.
PEREIRA, L. A Psicologia das Decisões Econômicas: Heurísticas e Teorias de Decisão. Brasília: Editora da UnB, 2015.
RADNOR, Z.; OSBORNE, S. P. Analyzing continuous improvement in the public sector: A systems approach. Public Money & Management, v. 33, n. 1, p. 19–26, 2013.
RODRIGUES, M. M.; BARBOSA, L. A.; MAZINI, M. C. de V. Tomada de decisão gerencial: práticas e teorias. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2020.
ROUILLARD, J. J. Decision-Making Styles in Public Administration: Understanding Biases and Promoting Objective Analysis. Public Administration Quarterly, v. 46, n. 1, p. 89-117, 2022.
SIMON, H. A. Theories of Bounded Rationality. In: RADNER, R.; RADNER, R. (Eds.). Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1972. p.161-176.
SIVAKUMAR, V.; SCHOEMAN, P. A knowledge-based approach to public value management: A case study of implementing changes in disability services in Western Australia. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 43, n. 6, p. 512–523, 2020.
VAN DER WAL, Z.; YANG, L. Control vectors and focus on the law: A comparative analysis of public and private sector ethics. Public Administration Review, v. 75, n. 3, p. 422–434, 2015.
WALKER, R. M.; ANDREWS, R. The impact of performance management under environmental turbulence. Public Administration, v. 93, n. 2, p. 435–455, 2015.
WONG, P. K.; HO, Y. P.; SINGH, A. Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, v. 35, n. 6, p. 941–958, 2007.
ZHOU, X.; LIAN, Y. The psychology of local authorities: Explaining strategic behavior in China’s target responsibility system. Public Administration, v. 98, n. 2, p. 362–377, 2020.
