AS DIFERENÇAS ENTRE OS CONCEITOS DE MORAL NO UTILITARISMO DE BENTHAM E JOHN STUART MILL: A MORALIDADE COMO DERIVADA DAS RESPECTIVAS NOÇÕES DE NATUREZA HUMANA
Keywords:
Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Moral, Ética, Utilitarismo, Natureza humana, Princípio de utilidadeAbstract
O objetivo desse artigo é compreender a diferença entre a
moralidade dos sistemas filosóficos de Bentham e John Stuart Mill,
bem como provar que há mais espaço para a elaboração de regras
morais no utilitarismo de Mill, quando comparado ao utilitarismo
de Bentham. Contudo, para que se entenda como a moral no
sistema de Bentham distingue-se da moral no sistema de Mill, é
necessário ter uma clara noção da natureza humana dos indivíduos
de ambos os autores e dos respectivos princípios de utilidade que
derivam destas distintas noções de natureza humana, pois o
conceito de moralidade de cada autor decorre das respectivas ideias
de natureza humana e do princípio de utilidade de tais autores.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES – Ética a Nicômaco. Trad. Leonel Vallandro e Gerd Bornheim. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1973.
ARISTÓTELES – Arte Retórica, Arte Poética. Trad. Antônio P. de Carvalho. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1964.
BENTHAM Jeremy. A Table of the Springs of Action. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.
__________.An Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.
__________.Bentham’s Theory of Fictions. In Ck Ogdeon. Londres: Routledge, 2000.
__________.Déontologie, ou Science de la morale, 1834. Disponível em: http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/bentham_jeremy/ deontologie_tome_1/deontologie_t1.html.
__________.Essay on Language. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.
__________.Essay on Logic. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.
__________.Uma Introdução aos Princípios da Moral e da Legislação. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1973.
BROWN D. G. – What is Mill´s Principle of Utility? Canadian Journal of Philosphy. v3, n 1, 1973.
BURNE P.– “Bentham and The Utilitarian Principle”. Mind, New Series, v. 58, n. 231, 1949.
CAPALDI Nicholas – A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
COLERIDGE S. Taylor. – Poetical Works. Londres: Pickering, 1828.
COMTE Auguste – Curso de Filosofia Positiva. Trad. José Artur Gianotti. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1973.
COOPER Neil – Mill’s “proof” of the principle of utility. Mind. Oxford, 78, 1969.
CRISP Roger – Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
DONNER Wendy – The Liberal Self. New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.
FEAGIAN L. Susan – Mill and Edwards on the Higher Pleasures. Philosophy. v. 58, n. 224, 1983.
GIANOTTI. A. José. – John Stuart Mill: O Psicologismo e a Fundamentação da Lógica. Tese. São Paulo, 1960.
GIBBS Benjamin – Higher and Lower Pleasures. Philosophy. v. 61, n. 235, 1986.
GOLDWORTH Amnon – Bentham’s Concept of Pleasure: Its Relation to Fictitious Terms. Ethics, v. 82, n. 4, 1972.
HART L.A.Herbert – Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
HEAN S. J. – Was Mill a Moral Scientist? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. v.67, n. 259, 1992.
HAZLITT H. – Pleasure as the End. In The Foundations of Morality”. Chicago: Chicago Press, 1964.
HOOGENSEN Gunhild. – “Bentham’s International Manuscripts Versus The Published “Works”. Journal of Bentham Studies, Londres, n. 2, 2001.
LEAVIS R. Frank – Mill on Bentham and Coleridge. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
LYONS David – Mill’s theory of morality. Nous 10, 1976.
MATTOS V. D. Laura – Economia política e mudança social: a filosofia econômica de John Stuart Mill, Edusp. São Paulo, 1998.
MCCLOSKEY H. John – John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study. Londres: Macmillan, 1971.
MCNAUGHTON Robert – A Metrical Concept of Happiness, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Providence, v. 14, n. 2, 1953.
MILGRAM E. – Mill’s Proof of the Principle of Utility, Ethics, v. 110 2000.
MILL J. Stuart (1843) – A Lógica das Ciências Morais. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1999.
___________(1843) – A System of Logic. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ (1865) – Auguste Comte and Positivism. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ (1873) – Autobiografia. Editado por Alexandre Braga Massella. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 2007.
___________ (1873) – Autobiography. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ (1838) – Bentham. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ (1840) – Coleridge. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ – Liberdade. Trad. Eunice Ostrensky. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.
MILL S. John– Utilitarismo (1861). Trad. Eunice Ostrensky. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
___________ (1824) – On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Investigation proper to it. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________ (1848) – Principles of Political Economy. Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
___________– Utilitarianism (1861). Edited by John M. Robson. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1985.
___________ (1861) – Utilitarianism and On Liberty. Ed.by Mary Warnock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
___________ (1861) – Utilitarianism. Edited by Roger Crisp. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
MILO D. Ronald – Bentham’s Principle. Ethics, Chicago, v. 84. n. 2, 1974.
PAULANI Leda – John Stuart Mill e o Estatuto do Homem Econômico. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Buenos Aires p. 27-32, 1999.
RAPHAEL D. D. – J.S. Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility, Utilitas, v. 6 , 1994.
RILEY Jonathan. – Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism. The Philosophical Quartely, v. 53, n. 212, 2003.
ROBSON M. John – The Improvement of Mankind: the Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.
RYAN Alan – The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Londres: Routledge, 1974.
RYBERG Jesper – Higher and Lower Pleasures: Doubts on Justification. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. v. 5, n. 4, 2002.
SIDGWICK H. – Bentham and Benthamism in Politics and Ethics. The Fortnightly Review, Melbourne, v. 21, 1877.
SINGER Marcus. – Actual Consequences of Utilitarianism. Mind, Oxford, v. 86, n. 3, 1977.
SKORUPSKI John – John Stuart Mill. Londres e Nova York: Routledge, 1989.
________________ – Why Read Mill Today? Londres e Nova York: Routledge, 2006.
WARKE Tom – “A Reconstruction of Classical Utilitarianism”. Journal of Bentham Studies, v. 3, 2000.
WEST Henry – Mill’s Utilitarianism. Londres: Continuum, 2007.
WORDSWORTH William. Selected Poems. Londres: Penguin, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
Français (Canada)
