Para além da análise de citação
uma metrologia Zimaniana para o diagnóstico da cultura científica contemporânea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2447-0198.2026v10n1ID41733Palavras-chave:
John Ziman (1925–2005), ciência pós-acadêmica, análise de citação, cultura científicaResumo
Ao reconhecer a instabilidade da análise de citação como o pilar do paradigma métrico clássico, este ensaio teórico-metodológico propõe o quadro metodológico PLACECC, uma expansão e operacionalização do diagnóstico de John Ziman sobre a ciência pós-acadêmica. Essa metrologia zimaniana supera a lógica puramente avaliativa dos indicadores para diagnosticar a cultura científica contemporânea. A proposta adiciona as novas dimensões, competitivo e comunal, ao acrônimo PLACE original, associando as sete dimensões resultantes a indicadores bibliométricos e altmétricos. Com isso, o quadro ressignifica as métricas como sintomas da tensão central da ciência atual: a disputa entre as forças de mercado e os valores da Ciência Aberta. Conclui-se que o PLACECC oferece uma matriz de diagnóstico cultural robusta, capaz de mapear empiricamente essas disputas que definem a ciência real e de deslocar o foco da mera contagem para a compreensão sociológica.
Downloads
Referências
AHMED, Sarah. Living a feminist life. Durham ; London: Duke University Press, 2017.
ARENTOFT, Michael; BERGHMANS, Stephane; BORRELL-DAMIAN, Lidia; BOTTARO, Silvia; FAURE, Jean-Emmanuel; GAILLARD, Vinciane; GLINOS, Kostas; ALBACETE, Javier Lopez; MORAIS, Rita; MORRIS, James; SCHILTZ, Marc; STROOBANTS, Karen. Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. COARA, 20 July 2022. Disponível em: https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BAIRD, Laura M.; OPPENHEIM, Charles. Do citations matter?. Journal of Information Science, v. 20, n. 1, p. 2-15, 1994. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159402000102. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016555159402000102. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BAWDEN, David; ROBINSON, Lyn. Information’s magic numbers: the numerology of information science. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. p. 180-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464. Disponível em: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/46038. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BEN-DAVID, Joseph; SULLIVAN, Teresa A. Sociology of science. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 1, p. 203-222, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001223. Disponível em: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001223. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BERRY, Michael; NYE, John F. John Michael Ziman: 16 May 1925, 2 January 2005. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, v. 52, p. 479-491, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbm.2006.0032. Disponível em: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsbm/article/doi/10.1098/rsbm.2006.0032/89179/John-Michael-Ziman-16-May-1925-2-January. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BORDIGNON, Frédérique; GAMBETTE, Philippe. A Corpus of Critical Citations Contexts. Journal of Open Humanities Data, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-6, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.215. Disponível em: https://enpc.hal.science/hal-04609609v1/document. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BORNMANN, Lutz. Scientific revolution in scientometrics: the broadening of impact from citation to societal. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. p.347-359.
BORNMANN, Lutz; DANIEL, Hans-Dieter. What do citation counts measure? a review of studies on citing behavior. Scientometrics, v. 64, n. 1, p. 45-80, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/jd/article-abstract/64/1/45/222089/What-do-citation-counts-measure-A-review-of?redirectedFrom=fulltext&utm_source=researchgate.net&utm_medium=article. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2004. Disponível em: https://favaretoufabc.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/bourdieu-pierre-os-usos-sociais-da-ciencia.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
BROADUS, Robert N. A citation study for sociology. The American Sociologist, v. 2, n. 1, p. 19, 1967.
BROOKS, Terrence A. Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 37, n. 1, p. 34-36, 1986. Disponível em: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v37y1986i1p34-36.html. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
CANO, V. Citation behavior: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 40, n. 4, p. 284-290, July 1989. Disponível em: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%28198907%2940%3A4%3C284%3A%3AAID-ASI10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
COLE, Jonathan R.; COLE, Stephen. Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the science citation index. The American Sociologist, v. 6, n. 1, p. 23-29, Feb. 1971. Disponível em: https://www.columbia.edu/cu/univprof/jcole/_pdf/1971ScienceCitationIndex.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
CRONIN, Blaise. The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham, 1984. Disponível em: https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/cronin/citationprocess.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
CRONIN, Blaise. The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation, v. 37, n. 1, p. 16-24, Mar. 1981. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb026703. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/jd/article-abstract/37/1/16/208757/THE-NEED-FOR-A-THEORY-OF-CITING?redirectedFrom=fulltext. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
DE BELLIS, Nicola. Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2009.
DERRICK, Gemma; DIDEGAH, Fereshteh; GROTH, Paul; NEYLON, Cameron; PRIEM, Jason; XU, Shenmeng; ZAHEDI, Zohreh. Refletions on Altmetrics. In: CHRISTIAN, Kathy et al. The state of altmetrics: a tenth anniversary celebration. Lincoln: DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2020. p. 5-11. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/scholcom/article/1172/&path_info=2020_10_State_of_Altmetrics.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
DERRICK, Gemma; SAMUEL, Gabrielle. The future of societal impact assessment using peer review: pre-evaluation training, consensus building and inter-reviewer reliability. Palgrave Communications, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.40. Disponível em: https://d-nb.info/1198596147/34. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
DESROSIÈRES, Alain. The politics of large numbers: a history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Disponível em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/390311969/Alain-Desrosieres-The-Politics-of-Large-Numbers. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
DORA. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. San Francisco, CA, 16 Dec. 2012. Disponível em: https://sfdora.org/read/. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
EDGE, David. Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical review. History of Science, v. 17, n. 2, p. 102-134, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/007327537901700202. Disponível em: https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1979HisSc..17..102E. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
EKBIA, Hamid R. The Flesh of Science: Somatics and Semiotics. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. p. 248-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464. Disponível em: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/46038. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
FLECK, Ludwick. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, v. 178, n. 4060, p. 471-479, 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.178.4060.471. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. John Wiley & Sons, 1979. Disponível em: https://archive.org/details/citationindexing0000garf/mode/2up. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GARFIELD, Eugene. Science citation index: A new dimension in indexing. Science, v. 144, n. 3619, p. 649-654, 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.144.3619.649. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.144.3619.649. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GARFIELD, Eugene. The ethics of scientific publishing. In: GARFIELD, E. (org.). Essays of an Information Scientist. Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1980.
GARFIELD, Eugene. The evolution of the science citation Index. International Microbiology, v. 10, n. 1, p. 65-69, 2007. Disponível em: https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/barcelona2007a.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GARFIELD, Eugene.; MALIN, Morton V.; SMALL, Henrry. Citation data as science indicators. In: ELKANA, Yehuda; LEDERBERG, Joshua; MERTON, Robert K.; THACKRAY, Arnold; ZUUCKERMAN, Harriet (ed.). Toward a Metric of Science: the advent of science Indicators. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978. p. 179-208.
GINGRAS, Yves. Bibliometrics and research evaluation: uses and abuses. MIT Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10719.001.0001. Disponível em: https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/4081/Bibliometrics-and-Research-EvaluationUses-and. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GLÄSER, Jochen. Scientific Specialties as the (Currently Missing) Link Between Scientometrics and the Sociology of Science. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, 8., 2001, Sydney. Proceedings [...] Sydney: BIRG, 2001. V. 1. p. 191-210. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281091656_Scientific_specialties_as_the_currently_missing_link_between_scientometrics_and_the_sociology_of_science. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GRECO, Pietro. John Ziman. Journal of Science Communication, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-2, Dec. 2006. Disponível em: https://jcom.sissa.it/article/205/galley/296/download/#:~:text=If%20this%20communication%20is%20enhanced,dynamics%20driving%20science%20and%20society.&text=University%20Press%20(1968).&text=University%20Press%20(1978).,Cambridge%20University%20Press%20(2000). Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
GREGORY, Kathleen; NINKOV, Anton; RIPP, Chantal; ROBLIN, Emma; PETERS, Isabella; HAUSTEIN, Stefanie. Tracing data: A survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation. Quantitative Science Studies, v. 4, n. 3, p. 622–649, Summer 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00264. Disponível em: https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/4/3/622/117500/Tracing-data-A-survey-investigating-disciplinary. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
HICKS, Diana M.; KATZ, J. Sylvan. Where Is Science Going? Science, Technology, & Human Values, v. 21, n. 4, p. 379-406, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100401. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016224399602100401. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
HICKS, Diana; WOUTERS, Paul; WALTMAN, Ludo; RIJCKE, Sarah de; RAFOLS, Ismael. Bibliotemetrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, v. 520, p. 429-431, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275335177_The_Leiden_Manifesto_for_research_metrics. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Informetrics needs a foundation in the theory of science. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. p. 20-46.
KAPLAN, Norman. The norms of citation behavior: prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, v. 16, n. 3, p. 179-184, June 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.5090160305. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.5090160305. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
LATOUR, Bruno. Science in Action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
MACROBERTS, Michael H.; MACROBERTS, Barbara R. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 40, n. 5, p. 342-349, Sep. 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%28198909%2940%3A5%3C342%3A%3AAID-ASI7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U. Disponível em: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198909)40:5%3C342::AID-ASI7%3E3.0.CO;2-U. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MACROBERTS, Michael H.; MACROBERTS, Barbara R. Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, v. 36, n. 3, p. 435-444, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129604. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf02129604. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MERTON, Robert King. The Sociology of Science: theoretical and empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
MEY, Marc de. Bibliometrics and the Structure of Science. In: MEY, Marc de. The Cognitive Paradigm. Dordrecht: Springer, 1982. Chapter 7. p. 111-131. (Sociology of the Sciences Monographs; 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7956-7_7. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-7956-7_7. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MIDGLEY, Mary. Mapping science: in memory of John Ziman. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, v.30, n. 3, p. 195-197, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805X42063. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1179/030801805X42063. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MITROFF, Ian I. The subjective side of science: a philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the apollo moon Scientists. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1974.
MOED, Henk F. Altmetrics as Traces of the Computerization of the Research Process. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R. (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. p. 360-371.
MOED, Henk F. Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.
MORAVCSIK, Michael J.; MURUGESAN, Poovanaligam. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, v. 5, n. 1, p. 86-92, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/030631277500500106. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MULKAY, Michael Joseph. Conformity and Innovation in Science. The sociological review, v. 18, p. 5-23,1970. Supplement 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1970.tb03173.x. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1970.tb03173.x. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
MÜLLER, Ruth; RIJCKE, Sarah de. Thinking with indicators: exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences. Research evaluation, v. 26, n. 4, p. 361, Oct. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx033. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/26/4/361/4554783. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
PATIENCE, Gregory S.; PATIENCE, Christian A.; BLAIS, Bruno; BERTRAND, Francois. Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon, v. 3, n. 5, p. e00300, May 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300. Disponível em: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(16)32280-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844016322800%3Fshowall%3Dtrue. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
POLANYI, Michael. The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva, v. 1, n. 1, p. 54-74, 1962.
PRICE, Derek de Solla; GÜRSEY, Suha. Studies in scientometrics I: transience and continuance in scientific authorship. Ciência da Informação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, p. 27-40, 1975. Disponível em: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Studies_in_Scientometrics_I_Transience_and_Continuance_in_Scientific_Authorship_%28Cionline_64%29.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
PRICE, Derek J. de Solla. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963. Disponível em: https://archive.org/details/littlesciencebig0000dere/page/54/mode/2up. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
PRIEM, Jason; TARABORELLI, Dario; GROTH, Paul; NEYLON, Cameron. Altmetrics: a manifesto. Altmetrics.org, 26 Oct. 2010. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=scholcom. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2025.
RAZUMOVA, Irina K.; KUZNETSOV, Alexander. Impact of Open Access Models on Citation Metrics. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, v. 7, n. 2, p. 23–31, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1633/jistap.2019.7.2.2. Disponível em: https://accesson.kr/jistap/v.7/2/23/7401. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
REIS, Verusca Moss Simões dos. O retorno ao ethos mertoniano na ciência pós-acadêmica de John Michael Ziman. Revista Brasileira de Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade, v. 2, n. 1, p. 194-210, 2011.
REIS, Verusca Moss Simões dos; VIDEIRA, Antonio Augusto Passos. John Ziman e a ciência pós-acadêmica: consensibilidade, consensualidade e confiabilidade. Scientiæ Studia, v. 11, n. 3, p. 583-611, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662013000300007. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ss/a/wdySgPmwXtzkrXjLy98QWNC/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ROTHER, Edna Terezinha. Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, v. 20, n. 2, p. 5-6, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ape/a/z7zZ4Z4GwYV6FR7S9FHTByr/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
SCHOLASTICA; ALTMETRIC. The evolution of impact indicators: from bibliometrics to altmetrics. Scholastica, 2021.
SHORE, Chris; WRIGHT, Susan. Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In: STRATHERN, Marilym (org.). Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge, 2000. p. 57-89. Disponível em: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/52394/1/32.pdf.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
SMITH, Linda C. Citation analysis. Library Trends, v. 30, n. 1, p. 83-106, Summer 1981. Disponível em: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/7149. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
VARA, Ana María. An insider's view on science and society: re-reading John Ziman. Journal of Science Communication, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.05040303. Disponível em: https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/Jcom0504(2006)C03/. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
VESSURI, Hebe M. C. The social study of science in Latin America. Social Studies of Science, v. 17, n. 3, p. 519-554, 1987.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003006. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/030631287017003006. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
WHITLEY, Richard D. From the sociology of scientific communities to the study of scientists' negotiations and beyond. Social Science Information, v. 22, n. 4-5, p. 681-720, July 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022004004. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/053901883022004004?_gl=1*lph4s2*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTI5MDc5ODQzMS4xNzcyMTUxMjg3*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NzIxNTEyODckbzEkZzEkdDE3NzIxNTEzNzIkajQzJGwwJGgxNjQxODEyMTI0. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
WHITLEY, Richard. D. Black boxism and the sociology of science: a discussion of the major developments in the field. The Sociological Review, v. 18, n. 1, p. 61-92, 1970. Supplement 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1970.tb03176.x. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1970.tb03176.x. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
WHITLEY, Richard. The Intellectual and social organization of the sciences. 2nd. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
WILSDON, James. The metric tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015.
WOUTERS, Paul F. Citation cycles and peer review cycles. Scientometrics, v. 38, n. 1, p.39-55, 1997. Disponível em: https://scispace.com/pdf/citation-cycles-and-peer-review-cycles-3v1f09fscf.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. A força do conhecimento. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia; São Paulo: EDUSP, 1981.
ZIMAN, John. Academic science as a system of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, v. 45, n. 1, p. 41-61, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.1991.tb01555.x. Disponível em: https://www.scilit.com/publications/d4c620b81c5b442ba9c7d024a0050983. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. Citation gold standard. Nature, v. 410, p. 518-519, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35069132. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/35069132. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. Conhecimento público. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia; São Paulo: EDUSP, 1979.
ZIMAN, John. Emerging out of nature into history: the plurality of the sciences. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society v. 361, n. 1809, p. 1617-1633, Aug. 2003b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2003.1233. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12952677/. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. M. Are debatable scientific questions debatable? Social Epistemology, v. 14, n. 2-3, p. 187-199, 2000a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720050199225. Disponível em: https://sites.pitt.edu/~gordonm/Pubdeb/Ziman.pdf. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. M. Ciencia y sociedad civil. ISEGORÍA, v. 28, p. 5-17, 2003a, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2003.i28.503. Disponível em: https://isegoria.revistas.csic.es/index.php/isegoria/article/view/503. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. M. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature, v. 224, 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224318a0. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/224318a0. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. Postacademic science: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, v. 9, n. 1, p. 67-80, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55095. Disponível em: https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/55095. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. Real science: what it is, and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000b.
ZIMAN, John. Rules of the game of doing science. Nature, v. 400, p. 721, Aug. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/23379. Disponível em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/546862874/Ziman-1999-Rules-Science-23379. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. The continuing need for disinterested research. Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 8, n. 3, p. 397-399, Sep. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0060-z. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-002-0060-z. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZIMAN, John. The Problem of “problem Choice”. Minerva, v. 25, n. 1/2, p. 92-106, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096858. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01096858. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZUCKERMAN, Harriet. Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, v. 12, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016675. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02016675. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
ZUCKERMAN, Harriet. The sociology of science and the Garfield effect: happy accidents, unanticipated developments and unexploited potentials. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, v. 3, p. 20, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00020. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/research-metrics-and-analytics/articles/10.3389/frma.2018.00020/full. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Alexandre Masson Maroldi
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores manterão seus direitos autorais e garantirão à revista o direito de primeira publicação de seu trabalho, que estará simultaneamente sujeito à Licença Internacional Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Os usuários podem ler, baixar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar ou enlaçar os artigos completos desta revista, sem a necessidade de requerer permissão ao editor ou ao autor, desde que seu autor e sua primeira publicação sejam indicados. A licença não permite usos comerciais dos artigos publicados.
Os autores podem adotar outros contratos de licença não exclusivos para a distribuição da versão da obra publicada (ex: depositar em repositório institucional ou publicar em volume monográfico) desde que indicada a publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores são autorizados e recomendados a divulgar seus trabalhos pela Internet (por exemplo, em repositórios institucionais ou em seus sites) antes e durante o processo de submissão, o que pode levar a trocas interessantes e aumentar as citações de o trabalho publicado. Nesse caso, solicitamos que o cabeçalho do manuscrito indique: "Esta é uma versão pre-print enviada à Revista Informação na Sociedade Contemporânea (https://periodicos.ufrn.br/informacao)"
A Revista Informação na Sociedade Contemporânea adere aos principios e valores da publicação científica como expressos por AmeliCA para preservar o acceso aberto ao conhecimento científico sob modelos não comerciais.
