Ultrasound Assessment of the Antrum in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study on Perioperative Aspiration Risk

Autores

  • Wallace Andrino Silva Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes
  • Felipe Maciel de Oliveira Brunet
  • Rodrigo Fernandes Guimaraes
  • Aline Macedo Pinheiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/2179-7889.2025v16n2ID41103

Palavras-chave:

Diabetes, Ultrasound., perioperative, aspiration

Resumo

Background: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is a rare but serious perioperative complication. Diabetic patients are considered at higher risk due to potential delayed gastric emptying. To compare gastric residual volume and aspiration risk between diabetic and non-diabetic patients using ultrasound measurement of the gastric antrum.

Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included 86 adult patients (38 diabetics, 48 non-diabetics) assessed via abdominal ultrasound in supine and right lateral decubitus positions. Antral cross-sectional area was measured, and gastric volume calculated using validated mathematical models. Statistical analyses compared body mass index (BMI), age, fasting duration, and gastric volume between groups.

Results: Diabetic patients had a higher mean BMI (26.46 ± 1.78 vs. 24.69 ± 3.38, p = 0.004) and were older (58.74 ± 8.46 vs. 47.71 ± 16.21 years, p < 0.001). Fasting times did not differ significantly (p = 0.243). No statistically significant difference was found in gastric emptying status or aspiration risk between groups (p = 0.266).

Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus alone did not significantly impact gastric emptying in this sample. Standard fasting protocols appear adequate for most diabetic patients without gastroparesis symptoms.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

22-12-2025

Como Citar

SILVA, Wallace Andrino; FELIPE MACIEL DE OLIVEIRA BRUNET; RODRIGO FERNANDES GUIMARAES; ALINE MACEDO PINHEIRO. Ultrasound Assessment of the Antrum in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study on Perioperative Aspiration Risk. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 11–16, 2025. DOI: 10.21680/2179-7889.2025v16n2ID41103. Disponível em: https://www.periodicos.ufrn.br/jscr/article/view/41103. Acesso em: 8 fev. 2026.

Edição

Seção

Artigos Originais