Book Review: How to Do Relevant Research: From the Ivory Tower to the Real World. Mirvis, P. H., Mohrman, S. A. & Worley, C. G. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. 200p. ISBN: 978-1-78811-939-9
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2026v18n1ID42052Keywords:
Sweet Spot; Engaged Scholarship; Actionable Knowledge; Abduction; Pattern Matching; Realist Rationality; Rigor and Relevance; Case Studies.Abstract
Objective: The central objective of this approach is to overcome decades-long tension in academia by demonstrating that systematic research can simultaneously advance theory and generate knowledge relevant to urgent practical problems. The authors advocate for the "sweet spot," an intersection where scientific rigor (internal validity) and practical relevance (usefulness) are optimized. This focus aims to produce actionable knowledge—applicable, useful, and theoretically grounded—that supports managerial action.
Methodology: The methodology is characterized by Engaged Scholarship, requiring philosophical pluralism and the co-creation of knowledge with practitioners. The ideal theorizing process is abduction, which systematically combines empirical observation (practice) and theoretical frameworks (what is known) to formulate plausible hypotheses. Rigor is optimized for field reality, employing multiple methods and parallel studies, such as case studies and natural experiments.
Results: Knowledge produced in the sweet spot should have conceptual value (models and frameworks), instrumental value (actionable tools and recipes), and symbolic value (justifies actions and confers credibility). The application of this research promotes realist rationality in decision-making, which recognizes human cognitive limitations and the value of considering evidence from multiple sources, including the interests of diverse stakeholders.
Study Contributions: The main contribution is a roadmap for researchers to operate as "bilinguals," capable of insourcing practitioners' knowledge to enrich theory. Relevant research advances theorizing through disciplined imagination, focusing on mid-range theory and generating theories for practice (action-oriented).
Downloads
References
1. Argyris, C. (1968). Some unintended consequences of rigorous research. Psychological Bulletin, 70(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026145
2. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Heinemann.
3. Davis, M. S. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211
4. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
5. Gond, J. P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12074
6. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
7. Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
8. Mirvis, P. H., Mohrman, S. A., & Worley, C. G. (2021). How to do relevant research: From the ivory tower to the real world. Edward Elgar Publishing.
9. Mohrman, S. A., Gibson, C. B., & Mohrman, A. M. (2001). Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069461
10. Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208679
11. Rousseau, D. M. (2020). Evidence-based management and professional responsibility. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(3), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0114
12. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press.
13. Waddock, S. (2015). Reflections: Intellectual Shamans, Sensemaking, and Memes in Large System Change, Journal of Change Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2015.1031954
14. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308376
15. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)